Glossary entry (derived from question below)
Italian term or phrase:
CT degli imputati
English translation:
expert witness for the defendants
Added to glossary by
James (Jim) Davis
Nov 1, 2011 11:15
12 yrs ago
4 viewers *
Italian term
CT degli imputati
Italian to English
Law/Patents
Law (general)
From a court case document involving expert medical witness statements: "Il solo Prof. [name], CT degli imputati, ravvisa focolai di steatosi e citolisi con infiltrati che deporrebbe per una steatoepatite."
Proposed translations
(English)
4 +2 | expert witness for the defendants | James (Jim) Davis |
4 +1 | technical expert | Thomas Roberts |
Change log
Nov 3, 2011 14:35: James (Jim) Davis Created KOG entry
Proposed translations
+2
3 mins
Selected
expert witness for the defendants
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
Comment: "Thank you all!"
+1
1 hr
technical expert
It depends how nitpicking you want to be.
Technically speaking, an expert witness in Italy would be a witness who appears in person to give evidence who has particular expertise, whereas a technical expert is normally commissioned by the court to give an expert opinion, which is normally submitted as a written report (although they may be called in person, but this is not a requirement and does not always happen).
I suppose the difference would be that a doctor who actually treated the patient at issue in the trial would be an expert witness, whereas a third party doctor who gives an opinion without actually having witnessed the events would be a technical expert.
However, since this distinction does not exist in the common law, you may be best following Jim's suggestion.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 1 hr (2011-11-01 12:58:34 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
technical expert "for the accused"
Technically speaking, an expert witness in Italy would be a witness who appears in person to give evidence who has particular expertise, whereas a technical expert is normally commissioned by the court to give an expert opinion, which is normally submitted as a written report (although they may be called in person, but this is not a requirement and does not always happen).
I suppose the difference would be that a doctor who actually treated the patient at issue in the trial would be an expert witness, whereas a third party doctor who gives an opinion without actually having witnessed the events would be a technical expert.
However, since this distinction does not exist in the common law, you may be best following Jim's suggestion.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 1 hr (2011-11-01 12:58:34 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
technical expert "for the accused"
Note from asker:
Thanks for the clarification, although in the context I followed Jim's suggstion, this was very informative! |
Peer comment(s):
agree |
James (Jim) Davis
: Hi Tam, I've see CT per il giudice as court appointed expert, and where the defence went and got their own expert as in the recent famous murder case....
2 days 1 hr
|
Something went wrong...